Practice assessment

University Research Methods

Choose a task, write your answer, see why marks were gained or lost, then repair the weakest area.

Practice question · 2026.1-template

University Research Methods

Generic practice template; specific course documents required

3 questions
Choose your task

Pick the question you want to practise.

Use a focused task for quick practice or a longer task for a more realistic attempt.

Selected question

Question 1: Hybrid working and productivity

Focused practice · 20 minutes · Short academic response

What this question checks
  • Design fit
  • Justification
  • Validity
What happened

A student wants to study whether hybrid working improves productivity among small-business employees.

Your job

Propose a suitable design and explain one limitation and mitigation.

Answer formatShort academic response
Suggested time20 minutes
How this will be marked

What the marker is looking for

These are the areas used to build the formative mark range.

Research design5 marks

Selects a suitable research design.

For full marks: Specify the design, participants, data source and broad procedure.
Justification5 marks

Explains why the design fits the question.

For full marks: Connect each design choice to the research question and the type of inference required.
Limitation5 marks

Identifies a meaningful limitation.

For full marks: Explain how the limitation affects validity, reliability, generalisability or causal inference.
Improvement5 marks

Suggests a realistic mitigation or improvement.

For full marks: Propose a feasible mitigation that directly addresses the named limitation.
Practice timer00:00

20:00 left from the suggested time.

Before you write

What this answer should include

Use this as a planning guide. It is not a substitute for your own judgement.

Choose the design

Name the research design, sample and data-collection method.

Justify the choice

Connect the method to the research question and evidence needed.

Identify a real limitation

Explain the effect on validity, reliability or generalisability.

Give a workable improvement

Propose a practical mitigation that addresses that limitation.

Use academic clarity

Keep claims precise and avoid unsupported certainty.

Your answer

Write your response

0 words
Live answer checks

0/5 checks passed

These checks guide preparation only. They do not calculate the mark.

0/5
Main point stated

State the central issue, position, method or defence clearly.

Question details used

Use details or terminology from this specific task.

Method or improvement stated

Develop the action, position, method or defence required by the task.

Reasoning explained

Explain why the point matters or how the conclusion follows.

Enough detail

Aim for at least 60 words for a useful estimate.

00:00 used

The structure helper adds headings and prompts only. Replace every bracketed instruction with your own answer.

Checking account...Your answer will still be kept on this browser.