A realistic score range
See the likely performance band without pretending an automated estimate is an official result.
Assessments Aced turns your written or oral response into a score range, criterion-level evidence and one precise task to improve next.
The feedback shows the exact evidence used, the marks likely gained and the gap holding the answer back.
Every assessment is organised around three things: the likely result, the evidence behind it and the repair task that comes next.
See the likely performance band without pretending an automated estimate is an official result.
Each criterion is linked to wording from your own answer, so the feedback is inspectable.
Turn feedback into deliberate practice instead of receiving another page of general advice.
Progress is organised around the weakest marking criterion, not a dashboard full of disconnected activity.
Run the sample assessment →Start with the qualification, assignment or oral defence you are actually preparing for.
Write, paste or—where supported—record the answer exactly as you would under assessment conditions.
Use the evidence ledger and focused task, then retest to see whether the score range improves.
Each module has its own criteria, response format and scoring logic. The first four modules are shown below.
Original SBL-style scenarios covering technical judgement, scenario application and professional communication.
Original IELTS-style prompts with feedback aligned to the four official Writing criteria.
Practise defending contribution, methodology, limitations and alternative interpretations.
Practise research design, methodology selection, validity, reliability and critical evaluation.
Use a complete sample assessment first. Paid modules are planned, but this prototype does not take payments yet.
One complete sample with score range, evidence ledger and repair task.
Start the samplePlanned features include repeat attempts, saved history, weakness tracking and readiness reporting.
View current modules